Концепция развития механизма репутационной ответственности организации в рамках новой модели научной аттестации (С.В. Нарутто, А.В. Бодров, журнал "Правоприменение", том 7, N 3, июль-сентябрь 2023 г.)

Нарутто С.В., Бодров А.В. Концепция развития механизма репутационной ответственности организации в рамках новой модели научной аттестации

С.В. Нарутто - доктор юридических наук, профессор кафедры конституционного и муниципального права Московский государственный юридический университет имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА), г. Москва, Россия

А.В. Бодров - кандидат химических наук, начальник учебно-методического управления, доцент кафедры общей и органической химии, Казанский государственный медицинский университет, г. Казань, Россия

Рассматривается концепция развития механизма репутационной ответственности организаций, наделенных правами, предусмотренными п. 3.1 ст. 4 Федерального закона от 23 августа 1996 г. N 127-ФЗ "О науке и государственной научно-технической политике". Предлагаются конкретные инструменты для реализации механизма репутационной ответственности организаций, наделенных правом самостоятельного присуждения ученых степеней. Обосновывается, что в рамках новой модели научной аттестации развитие института репутационной ответственности указанных организаций является залогом обеспечения качества воспроизводимых научных кадров.

Ключевые слова: Научная аттестация, ученая степень, диссертационный совет, репутация, этика

Narutto S.V., Bodrov A.V. The concept of the development of the mechanism of reputational responsibility of the organization within the framework of a new model of scientific attestation

S.V. Narutto - Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

A.V. Bodrov - PhD in Chemistry; Head, Department of Education and Methodology; Associate Professor, Department of General and Organic Chemistry Kazan State Medical University

The purpose of the article is to propose specific tools for the implementation of the mechanism of reputational responsibility of organizations with the right to independently award academic degrees. The article examines the method of self-examination of the certification model of the organization, indicators of its effectiveness, and also provides proposals for the development of indicators for monitoring the activities of dissertation councils of organizations with the right to independently award academic degrees. The use of general logical research methods, including analysis and synthesis, the formal legal and comparative legal methods, allowed the authors to come to the following conclusions: (1) for the effective conduct of self-examination in each organization, it is advisable to adopt local regulations that approve the regulation on the procedure for conducting self- examination and the report on the conduct of self-examination; (2) the list of information and data given in the article to be assessed during self-examination is exemplary, and can be expanded taking into account the characteristics of a scientific or educational organization; (3) organizations can be recommended to distribute digests about the dissertations defended, their real contribution to the development of science to leading educational and scientific organizations, and post them in free access on the official website of the organization. They may also contain information about self-examination and monitoring of dissertation councils, scientific attestation processes, other information that contributes to the formation of a stable positive image of the organization, the scientific community's trust in its certification model. It is substantiated that, within the framework of the new model of scientific attestation, the development of the institution of reputational responsibility of organizations with the right to independently award scientific degrees is the key to ensuring the quality of reproducible scientific personnel.

Keywords: Scientific attestation, academic degree, dissertation council, reputation, ethics